Old 02-13-21, 09:27 PM
  #36  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,957

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4848 Post(s)
Liked 3,980 Times in 2,584 Posts
In my sailboat racing days on the west coast, it was commonly heard that 1) the lightest containers were placed highest - completely obvious if you understand ship stability - and that those containers were not secured as well - again completely by plan. If the ship were to be hit from the side with an 80 mph blast of wind and a 70' wave, the more containers that broke off, the more likely they were of living, sailing to port and coming home. Everybody on board knows this. The lost containers are just an insurance report to be filed.

That 80 mph wind and 70' wave might sound like an exaggeration or once in a lifetime event. I used to do the calcs and issue the stability reports for offshore fishing vessels, some as large as 250'. Small ships. One of the criteria the vessels I wrote the reports for had to meet was called "Severe Wind and Roll". It was a calculation of how much stability was lost when the vessel was struck from the side by a wave in a storm. My specialty was calculating how many of the big Bering Sea crabpots could be stacked on deck and meet that criteria - ie how much money they could make and still come home. The container ships are no different, just bigger.
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney: