Originally Posted by
3alarmer
...I always assumed it had something to do with giving maximal access to the cotters, for removal and reinstallation. It's my own assumption, and might be wrong. Might have just been ease of manufacturing, given the machinery available, and the limitations of it.
Sure ...the cotter pin arrangement necessitated a good chunk of steel width in the crank to give strength. However I don't believe complexity provides an explanation. I have a 1903 Sunbeam that has a 2 speed epi-cylic BB with 150 1/8" ball-bearings - still going strong.
I mean to say ......what kind of maniac would attempt to manufacture something like that.