View Single Post
Old 03-18-21 | 08:24 AM
  #28  
Johno59
Banned.
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 854
Likes: 334
From: Cambridge UK

Bikes: 1903 24 spd Sunbeam, 1927 Humber, 3 1930 Raleighs, 2 1940s Sunbeams, 2 1940s Raleighs, Rudge, 1950s Robin Hood, 1958 Claud Butler, 2 1973 Colnago Supers, Eddie Merckx, 2 1980 Holdsworth, EG Bates funny TT bike, another 6 or so 1990s bikes

Originally Posted by SJX426
Not sure I understand your question. The difference to me is that the liner has a lot more lubricity properties than a steel cable on a steel surface. As the cable starts a groove, the contact surface area increases with a corresponding resistance or drag, coefficient of friction kinda thing. The liner is probably better than when the cable was cutting through the paint!

It is worth checking every once in a great while for the cable cutting through the liner. I don't know what the service life is of either cable liner shown.
The grooves are part of the design, they are not caused by the cable travelling a cm every now and then. In my experience the better bikes had grooves cut into the BB shell and the cheaper used a plastic mold attached to the bottom of the shell.
If the grooved guideway wasn't better why is it used on more expensive bikes?
Johno59 is offline  
Reply