Old 05-26-21, 07:00 PM
  #10  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,520
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 265 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
^Good point. My guess is that if one held steady power at a variety of cadences, Calories would vary with the cadence, lower cadence, fewer Calories. HR varies with cadence at a steady power and gradient, so I assume Calories would do the same.
Up to a point. The most efficient cadence falls around 60 rpm and decreases above and below that point.
asgelle is offline  
Likes For asgelle: