View Single Post
Old 02-22-06, 08:04 AM
  #20  
Trsnrtr
Super Modest
 
Trsnrtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,468

Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC

Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 4,621 Times in 2,124 Posts
Originally Posted by ridgeracer
Sources?!

Just as the OP cited sources, so we all should when stating 'facts'.

Unfortunately, on the net, everyone seems to get away with 'I heard', 'I saw', 'I read somewhere', 'Its common knowledge' etc.

For me, if one can't cite sources, its irrelevant at best.
In literally less than 30 sec., I found these results:

http://www.ambikerace.com/2005/resul...sults%2005.pdf

If you look down the list, you'll see:

65+ 56.39.45
60+ 55.57.38
50+ 50.04.20

and while you are there, look at the recumbent times.

43.51.04 for a guy that I'm sure is in his 60s
46.48.10 for a guy that i know is in his 40s

I pulled these down in seconds. I'm sure across the country, one would find more results like these or better.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!







Trsnrtr is offline