Sorry, good question. I have a super aggressive race bike from twelve years ago that just (if it ever really did) doesn't do the trick for my current flexibility level. All the alterations in the world have been done to the old machine to make it rideable, but it's just way too aggressive a geometry for where I'm at/going to be. The goal of the fit was to better ID what types of frames and setups would be best (ie where on the endurance scale I needed to be or could I get away with something more aggressive on geometry). As an example, we used dimensions of a 54 Synapse. So they will be giving me those rough XYZ dimensions (stack, reach, etc) where we landed on comfort, and I'm trying to better ID how to translate that to what frame to build up IF they don't have something I want in their inventory/near-term (very likely given what they say).

AKA if I decide that maybe I want a Cervelo Caledonia or Canyon Endurace (or insert X bike here) frame to build up that I come across as available, how do I make sure it isn't too far out of the general range (or more specifically what ranges are ok on certain things. I've been playing around with Geometry Geeks and Velofit to try to gage how things compare, but obviously don't want to mess it up.