Old 07-25-21, 06:24 PM
  #54  
Steve B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,013

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3324 Post(s)
Liked 2,166 Times in 1,227 Posts
Originally Posted by bikebikebike
Pretty much on target. other than ANT+ connectivity.
Phones are more costly and easier to damage in the bike environment, especially when they need to be frequently dismounted to carry from a parked bike.
Battery life is also an issue whenever you have a big bright color screen.

That said pulling off to make a call after being notified is only prudent and not in the least unreasonable.
We are still quite a way away from a car like mobile PAN that has the flexible capacity that the bigger car market took years to reach.
Bike computers are sort of like Flip-phones and will probably share their trajectory and fate.
Few enough pony up for the added SIM and data link for the Karoo, and I think that is the provenance of the hackers and marketing folks.
Phone still does phone stuff better.
Adding an ANT+ bridge seems to be inexpensive, but adds complexity that has a pretty narrow appeal.
Karoo added a second BT channel, because of the conflicts a single one appeared to create.
It's not like carrying a phone is an added burden, though carrying stuff you don't need is.
Adding a SIM card to a Karoo 2 was $12 for 125 minutes of data time.
Steve B. is offline