Thread: Elevation gain
View Single Post
Old 07-28-21 | 12:00 PM
  #72  
genejockey's Avatar
genejockey
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 23,607
Likes: 17,070
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Originally Posted by terrymorse
Well, the "size of the ruler" you choose can produce a substantial change in the accumulated vertical gain. So I guess that makes it worth paying attention to.

To keep from recording "silly small" undulations in elevation, devices use a low-pass filter that ignores changes below a certain amount. This filters out small variations due to sensor errors and very small uphills like freeway overpasses.

The de facto standard filter seems to be about 10 meters. If I recall correctly, that was what the Avocet 50 (the mother of all elevation recording bike computers) was set to.

Many arguments ensued over what the "proper" filter size should be, but 10 meters seems to have survived the assaults.
But what about Floridians, for whom freeway overpasses are the ONLY climbs?
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is offline  
Reply