Thread: size
View Single Post
Old 08-14-21 | 04:10 PM
  #6  
Korina's Avatar
Korina
Happy banana slug
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,545
Likes: 2,493
From: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way

Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930

I've always been skeptical of the "geometry is everything" approach, unless you're a racer. Reach, at least, is adjustable with stem and/or handlebar choice. Standover is written in stone.

PurpleJersey , when in doubt, consult Sheldon Brown, who has this to say about frame sizing. HTH.

EDIT: I should add, as a fellow short rider, that for anything but racing it's hard to go wrong with a '80s to early '90s steel mountain bike. The 26" wheels are proportional to our size frame, so no tortured geometry to squeeze too-large 700c wheels in there. They're also extremely versatile (as long as you stick with a rigid fork) too; they make great gravel bikes, commuters, tourers, grocery-getters, whatever you need. My commuter/explorer is only limited by the engine:



Last edited by Korina; 08-14-21 at 04:18 PM.
Korina is offline  
Reply