View Single Post
Old 10-14-21 | 05:46 PM
  #6  
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
Carbonfiberboy
just another gosling
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 2,644
From: Everett, WA

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Originally Posted by Alcanbrad
If you take the time to watch the GCN video, Notice how the drivetrain starts skipping on the steep sections, then they cut away to a more reasonable grade where everything is hunky-dorry. I wonder if the maker of this super tandem know what they are doing.......
Probably just a worn ring or cog. They were OOS, that's when one first notices it. Typical massively over-geared tandem. Also they aren't synced up very well. Shots from the front or back when effort is high show a lot of frame flex. The stoker is really reefing on the back of the bike - he rather thrashes around. Looks to me like the stoker compartment is 10%-15% longer than the the usual 28.5". That will cause more frame flex though it can be more aero, depending on the stoker's flexibility. For most recreational teams, I think the standard compartment length is more aero.

My guess is that this fancy bike is a bit lighter than two singles. Plus the usual tandem climb rate is proportional to the average of the 2 riders' watts/kg. If that's not the case, the team could be better synced. IMO. It makes a huge difference if both riders have the same power profile around the pedal circle. That tandem shouldn't be flexing.
__________________
Results matter

Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Reply