View Single Post
Old 10-22-21, 03:20 PM
  #13  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,378

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6225 Post(s)
Liked 4,228 Times in 2,372 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
If the crankset has been removed and reinstalled just touch more snugly and the FD was set up properly to begin with, the OP might see a rub; a rub that is quite properly fixed with just the limiting screw. Now, needing to push the cage in suggests another issue like cable/housing/lube but that's a separate issue in this case.
I can think of no situation where a crank that is undamaged would go on “more snugly” than the original installation. Even for square taper, there is a limit to how much the crank arm can slide onto the spindle. If someone over tightened (and damaged) the arm, that would change but just removing and reinstalling a crank will not change the location of the chainwheels.

I’ve removed and installed thousands of crank arms without needing to change the limit screw settings as long as the same crank is used.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline