View Single Post
Old 11-18-21, 11:45 AM
  #138  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,573

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7680 Post(s)
Liked 3,569 Times in 1,877 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
I think his point is that any ratios ~1 gear inch different (or ~2% or so) are meaninglessly different. They are effictively duplicates.

Here: Same data viewed in a different format.
yeah, but as we all know, it is a combination of available ratios and ease of access. The bugaboo of "overlap" matters when you have a 2x6 .... a 2x11 or 3x9, not so much. In fact, as I have said too wordily elsewhere, I have always liked knowing where near duplicates were so i could pre-shift---get into teh top of the small ring from the middle of the big ring at the base of a tough climb, for instance, or go from the middle of the small ring to the bottom of the big ring when i was coming to a corner so i could maximize ease of acceleration out of it.

The biggest issue I see with indyfabz' chart is big jumps, particularly at the ends. The chart indicates why 3x11 would be a superior touring/randonneurring set-up.
Maelochs is offline  
Likes For Maelochs: