View Single Post
Old 01-18-22 | 07:44 PM
  #10  
chaadster
Thread Killer
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,127
Likes: 2,154
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Originally Posted by BrazAd
Thanks - this is the kind of dialogue I was hoping to read. I know speed difference isn't going to be a major issue... other than from better rolling resistance, faster spin up, etc - those are things I've read about in reviews and wonder if they are true or not.

One friend has a set of Boyd CCC aluminum wheels... two others, carbon... all who got rid of the boat anchor OEM wheels.

Thanks again! I have some long gravel races/rides coming up and would like to be ready when they get here!

Gary
I definitely think that lighter wheels feel more lively and responsive. I mean, to get to the end of the ride as fast as possible you’re going to have to leave it all out on the road regardless of how your wheels feel, and so to some extent, stuff like liveliness and responsiveness are small potatoes, but at the margins, that’s where those little gains can add up. I think that, sometimes, that first second of throwing down gap-bridging power and whether the bike responds to it, is when I decide if I can do it or not, and particularly as a heavy rider over rolling terrain, I know that losing a wheel can set up a disastrous chain of challenges, so responsiveness is top wheel priority for me, making low weight super important.

Other riding styles and conditions could prioritize something like aero gains, or simply prefer a more balanced set of wheel attributes. You’ll just have decide where on the matrix of cost, depth, width and weight is the sweet spot for your needs.
chaadster is offline  
Reply