View Single Post
Old 01-24-22 | 12:25 PM
  #24  
bikingshearer's Avatar
bikingshearer
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,733
Likes: 4,378
From: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley

Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.

I don't like the idea of trying to find a replacement fork because the frame and fork were designed to go together - a change on the for geometry affects everything. For that reason, I've only ever bought frame-and-fork combos - with one exception. For that one, I bought (traded for, actually,) the frame only. It was a true grail for me (mid-60s Cinelli, written about at length elsewhere in C&V) in a not-common size (64cm ctc), so i did it. I didn't even think to check the alignment other than eyeballing. Not smart.

I had a fork for it, though. Same maker, a few years older, that came from a frame that was rusted out. The fact that I had the fork was the reason I was willing to get the frame only. The steerer tube needed to be lengthened, which was easily done by Ed Litton. So I have a cobbled together kinda-sorta Frankenframe, although frame and fork are both from Cinelli.

The result? Only the nest riding bike I have ever owned, the one I reach for 80 or 90% of the time. The one someone will have to pry out of my cold, dead hands.

I doubt if I will buy a frame-only again, though. There is nothing I want so much that I would be willing to deal with finding-the-right-fork issues.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
bikingshearer is offline  
Reply