View Single Post
Old 03-21-22, 08:09 PM
  #28  
dwmckee
Senior Member
 
dwmckee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468

Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times in 229 Posts
Originally Posted by katsup
​​​​​​Several articles say that a steel fork is more "compliant", they offer more vertical flex. I've also seen videos where people swap to a steel fork as they can feel the difference when riding over 50 miles on gravel.

How a fork was designed should make the most difference, regardless of material. Like frames, not all forks are created equal.
Sorry, a quality carbon gravel fork of course, not just any carbon road fork.

You can find a lot of bad advice mixed in with the good out there.

Only the cheapest steel gravel bikes still come standard with a steel fork. The exception would be the really heavy-built ones designed more for bikepacking with a loaded fork, etc., but in that case that is a steel fork for durability, not for comfort.
dwmckee is offline