View Single Post
Old 03-27-22 | 03:01 PM
  #12  
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
Andrew R Stewart
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 19,294
Likes: 5,385
From: Rochester, NY

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

The lack of mitering tube ends is more the method of larger high volume producers where saving 5 minutes per joint would really add up to a huge time savings after a few thousand frames. For a small short run or singular frame shop that savings has less value and could cost some reputation.

Perhaps the best known example of the savings that a well engineered joint (and joining process) can have is Trek. When they were still making their frames here in the US they began to use a one piece headtube and lugs form. A sheet of steel is stamped/cut, pierced and, wrapped then welded. Tange offered this part, among others. The head tube's "lug" were stamped relief, only the top and down tubes actually entered a socket. Those tubes were left square cut. Not only time savings from no mitering but also had less brazing filler in a far simpler joint to flow. Now add preheating stations on the frame brazing carousel and the time to flow the joint comes down to only a few minutes each joint. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Reply