Originally Posted by
rm -rf
I like to use the least torque that holds the components without slipping. That's often 20-30% lower than the recommended max.
I have an aluminum post in a carbon frame. That range of 6 nM works fine on my bike, no slippage. (I'm probably at 4-5 nM). I put a narrow tape strip on the post, just above the frame, to monitor for any slippage.
I use carbon assembly paste, which works great. My tube of Tacx assembly compound is 12+ years old, and I still have half the tube. It's a gel with tiny plastic grit particles. ( Tacx seems to be unavailable? The Park Tool Supergrip looks like a similar gel. )
I use the carbon paste on my aluminum stem to aluminum handlebar too. Note--carbon paste will dull the paint that's within the clamped area, the tiny particles are digging into the paint. That's just cosmetic, of course.
This is no doubt good policy, but I am trying to determine if the recommended max
changes when a carbon post is substituted for the original aluminum post.
I assume the recommeded 6nM is to prevent damage to the frame, rather than the alloy post. What I am curious about is whether substituting a carbon post reduces the recommended max out of concern for the post itself.