Originally Posted by
mschwett
yep. different underlying terrain models, different degrees of precision in those models and the way they interpolate the "2D" points onto the underlying model... and then just the inherent problems of that methodology. it took RwGPS about 10 years to not register riding across the golden gate bridge as dropping 200' to sea level, and then abruptly climbing 200' back up. an extreme example, but 400 additional feet of climbing per round trip.
I still see it doing that at some bridge crossings. Tunnels too. You should see a map of the Hiawatha Trail. It’s got at least 12 tunnels. The elevation spikes show grades of over 20% in some places. No way to really tell how much I climbed using RWGPS.