Originally Posted by
timtak
Why do you keep insisting on the pros Kapusta? Is it not enough that John Cobb's advice is from a paid and celebrated advisor to the pros, advising someone (Robbie) who rides like we do?
There is no Pro model for the amateur ride, but for some reason, you keep insisting upon a pro model. Why is this?.
Here is a refresher.....
Originally Posted by
timtak
tomato coupe and
WhyFi Both
Greg LeMond and Lance Armstrong did put John Cobb on their payroll. Go on, say, "Oh, sorry Tim!"
Originally Posted by
Kapusta
OK, so please show us an example of one of their bikes that is set up like yours, and looks any different from road racing bikes sold today.
Originally Posted by
timtak
Why look any further than Robbie's bike which I have already shown you?
Originally Posted by
Kapusta
Because (unless I am mistaken) that is neither Greg LeMond nor Lance Armstrong.
You keep using Cobb as the definitive source of why everyone's bike should be set up like yours. Then YOU brought up the fact that Armstrong and Lemond used Cobb. So it begs the question... why don't we see their bikes set up like yours with saddles pushed all the way back on setback posts and 220mm neg 45 deg stems?