Originally Posted by Ranger
More BS. How often you ride your bike has nothing to do with how much it costs. This is a misconception that i held as well when i started. Many told me that a Trek 4300 should only be ridden a few times a week for short rides, blah, blah, blah.
I've got 8,000 miles on one 4300 and over 5000 on the other and I ride virtually every day, and have for the last couple of years. I've ridden in 100 F weather, snow, rain, -20 F windchilll and not one single problem mechanically except for normal wear and tear and flats.
A bike is basically a frame with a bunch of components hanging on it. A $300 mountain bike is just as capable of riding very far and often as a $3,000 bike. That is a secret, but i'll let it out. The only difference is that a $300 bike may have components that are slightly better, but they will wear out just the same. Trust me, i've worn out quite a few things up to this point. Even better stuff.
Interestingly, i bought a minivan last May for $14,000. Since that time i have spent an extra $1500 on repairs. So with payments since then and repairs, I have spent almost $4,000 on it and driven it probably about 8,000 miles.
So the Trek 4300 was $350 new and i've gotten the same mileage out of it. ANd have never had a break down the way i have with the stupid van! Entry level means your bike didn't cost as much as someone else. No direct connection to how durable the bike is.
By that reasoning, the professional teams could save a lot of money by having their riders ride rockhoppers, or trek 4300's with alivio components.. after all they perform and last just as long.