View Single Post
Old 09-14-22, 12:20 PM
  #37  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,042

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5964 Post(s)
Liked 2,872 Times in 1,601 Posts
Originally Posted by t2p
@ 260 lbs + most any tire will be 'supple'

and paper thin sidewalls would become a negative
Suppleness has nothing to do with payload, it's an inherent property of the tire itself. Yes, it's relatively less important with heavier riders, but ANY increase in sidewall stiffness will increase rolling drag.

As for paper thin sidewalls, again not a rider weight related consideration. The structure and pressure rating of the tire is purely a function of the body plies. Rubber is added to the sidewalls purely to protect those body plies from weather and road hazards. Riders riding on paved roads at proper inflation don't need to worry about the sidewalls. However, if you have gum (para) covered sidewalls, be aware that these are subject to UV or weather damage, so periodic inspection may be called for.

IMO- and biased by 50+ years riding tubulars, the best --- most efficient --- tires for road use are the treadless skinside tires offered by the major brands.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Likes For FBinNY: