Thread: 27.5 vs 29
View Single Post
Old 01-02-23 | 02:18 PM
  #51  
vespasianus
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 886
Likes: 557
From: In the south but from North

Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel, Tommasini Mach Ti Gravel

Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
People rise to the defense of 26 as though it was correct while it was really an accident of history. When MTB's launched there had been an immediate prior fad of 26" BMX cruisers that used the beach cruiser tire size, so that was the only near adult size balloon knobby. Getting tires made was really the limiting factor. All the other fabrication stuff is just bending and mitering. The wheel machine can bend the rim extrusion to whatever size. But a tire mold is a big expensive tool requiring big corporate support to make and use in a big factory

27.5 got a reprieve this year thanks to some major companies making "mullet" bikes. But this time more than ever it seems like churn for churn's sake, especially since this time it's back to a pre-existing tire design. They did not come up with new width, tread, carcass, etc. It will be tough to see how this succeeds in the market since the whole market is in a nose dive right now
Agreed. As a guy who rides and loves his 26" mountain bike, there is nothing, and I mean nothing, that it does better than a modern 29er. There is ZERO reason why a person without special needs, should buy a new 26" bike. Today or tomorrow.

29er are now dialed, and with the modern geometry and design, are phenomenal.
vespasianus is offline  
Reply