View Single Post
Old 03-18-23 | 04:26 PM
  #121  
cyccommute's Avatar
cyccommute
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,108
Likes: 6,141
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by GhostRider62
I agree

Your approach is neither good nor enough. My approach is sufficiently accurate, precise and repeatable. It is not high precision. And, I do not need your silly lectures on significant figures or red herring examples WRT skipping gears. Seriously, you think you know everything. The resolution of all these devices is insufficient. Prove me wrong, find an R & R study. Unless you can do that, don't bother responding.
Jeez, you guys just don’t understand how this all works. It is not up to me to prove your point. You have to prove your own point. Shimano, SRAM, KMC, and a number of others make chain checking tools that why consider accurate enough, precise enough, and repeatable enough for their chains. Here’s what Shimano says about their tool


USAGE

  • Check the wear of chains accurately, easily and quickly
Here’s what Park says about their tool

​​​​​​​The Park Tool CC-3.2 is a go/no-go gauge designed to accurately indicate when a chain reaches 0.5% and 0.75% wear (or "stretch"), the points at which most chain manufacturers suggest replacement. The CC-3.2 is long, accurate,
​​​​​​​

Nope, I don’t know everything. But that doesn’t mean I know nothing.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is offline