View Single Post
Old 03-28-23 | 01:49 PM
  #14  
Trakhak's Avatar
Trakhak
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,973
Likes: 5,889
From: Baltimore, MD
Originally Posted by beng1
So it is not sensible to think that man can land rovers on Mars and has been designing bicycles for a few hundred years, and developing digital technology for seventy years, and should also be able to manufacture an accurate exercise bicycle. Okay...........
Spin bikes are a few generations behind the state of the art. I resisted spending the money on a smart trainer for years, but then succumbed.

I don't mind doing indoor rides throughout the winter when I can't face the cold or wet, but the little inner voice that wonders whether I should be working harder or taking it easier or doing either for longer or shorter intervals really saps my concentration.

Now, I just fire up Xert (software that monitors my fitness, or lack thereof, and my progress, or lack thereof, and dynamically adjusts the workout accordingly) and do the prescribed workout. The software controls the resistance on the basis of my heart rate, cadence, and power output (and also incorporates the same and other data from the previous week, month, etc.).

Turns out my previous indoor rides on dumb trainers were usually uniformly in the a-bit-too-hard-for-too-long zone, paradoxically limiting my progress. Now, I finish every hard-ish workout feeling moderately fatigued while knowing that the next day's workout will be set in a very easy recovery zone.

Many people like smart trainers for the social aspect of virtual group riding or racing. Tried that once or twice, but it felt too random. I do structured workouts exclusively.

Last edited by Trakhak; 03-28-23 at 02:05 PM.
Trakhak is offline  
Reply