Originally Posted by
genejockey
I think his point is that he started from his conclusion, and found a metric that appears to support it, so he keeps flogging it even when others point out the flaws. That's not how you do science. It's how you do propaganda.
Yep, and he continually ignores any data that doesn’t support his conclusion.
https://www.cyclingtips.com/2022/06/...investigation/
Race speeds have risen steadily over the past two decades until they skyrocketed in the past two years. What has caused this recent spike and more importantly, how is it possible?
He’s a broken record, incapable of objective thinking..