Originally Posted by
livedarklions
No, but they certainly can say that they rode 100 miles in that week.
There's no such thing as a week-long century ride since the definition of a century ride includes doing it in one day.. Which part of "in a day" do you not understand? You tried this stupid bit before. So, are you really saying that if I ride 150 miles in a day (which I have done several times), I haven't completed a century because I took a 90 minute lunch at 75 miles? That's less of an accomplishment than riding 100 miles without a break? How does that make sense? I've done both of those things several times, and I can definitely say that the 150 mile ride with the break is harder.
Agree, to me 240kms with a 90 minute break is way harder than 161kms with 2 or 3 10 minutes breaks.