Originally Posted by Emerson
Hi all,
I was planning on using some kind of suspension in the seat on my new Surly, but there is so little seatpost showing that it looks like a sprung saddle is my only choice for providing a little cush for the tush.
Does anyone have experience with both saddles and can provide some feedback on the differences between them. The 72 is lighter which is a good thing, but Bill at Wallingford Bike suggested that the 72 might not be a good choice for a heavier rider (I'm ~200 lbs).
I need something to absorb a bit more shock off my back. I ride quite upright and so need/want a wider saddle. Bike is used for a little of everything--commuting, bike trails, simple off-road, and hopefully some light touring this summer.
I await your wisdom. Thanks.
Like most others on this thread I would recommend the 67 over the 72 - the 3 coil springs on the 72 allow some side to side and back to front movement which can give a slightly wobbly feel to the ride, especially over uneven surfaces. The 67 is anchored at the front so it gives good bump absorption without the wobbly effect. I wouldn't worry about the weight difference.
Another one to consider is the Champion Flyer, 2 coil springs like the 67 but a narrower width. Depending on your setup this may be more suitable. The 67 & 72 are for setups with a pretty upright position, i.e. with the bars level with or above the saddle. If you use a more leaned forward position the Flyer might suit you better, be sure you mention this when you talk to Wallingfords.