So you don't find "I don't need no stinkin NASA arithmetic to tell me hydroplaning on a bicycle is moot. Ain't happening." to be a stupid remark? Maybe it was in jest, but that was exactly my point -- they needed to dial it down in order to generate a response.
I note with interest how fast and furious ad hominem attacks appear here, and yet, how few comments discuss the fact that NASA's investigation finds bicycle hydroplaning to be completely possible. I wonder why...
Because people don't find your argument by appeal to authority either compelling or accurate.