Old 07-05-23 | 07:34 AM
  #33  
sir_crash_alot's Avatar
sir_crash_alot
Sprinting for 6th place.
 
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 190
Likes: 114
From: Da Yoop (northern Michigan)

Bikes: Winspace SLC 2.0, Giant TCR Alliance

Originally Posted by Jughed
What if the structure is so lightweight/lightly built that it gets physically damaged from "normal" use? By "normal", I mean a 1800w++ pro rider putting the structure thru its paces over the course of a grand tour, or series of grand tours - where they exceed or come close to the max the design capabilities of said structure?

The claims I heard them make was that frames felt "dead" by the end of the tour. Is it not possible that the stresses they put the frames under cause micro damage that changes the characteristics of the structure?
My original sport is ice hockey, and this absolutely happens to our carbon fiber sticks. While most of them break after a month or two of heavy use at higher levels (if not sooner), if they survive, they lose their "kick" or "whip". They flex under load, but don't spring back as a fresh stick would. As a smaller player who didn't load sticks as much during my career, I seldom broke carbon sticks, but I did end up with a pile of "spent" sticks sitting in my garage, haha.

Edit: On that note, hockey players who "know" will tell you the performance differences in terms of kick between the mid-grade and upper-end sticks is minimal, the difference is weight-savings, as top end sticks are feather-light. Interestingly, the prevailing wisdom is that if you want a stick for pure performance (weight+kick) you get top end, but if you want a durable stick with kick, go mid-grade.

Last edited by sir_crash_alot; 07-05-23 at 07:40 AM.
sir_crash_alot is offline  
Reply