View Single Post
Old 07-18-23, 04:58 PM
  #54  
mschwett 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,044

Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1284 Post(s)
Liked 1,405 Times in 714 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
The front is slow and clunky because it is operated wrong. The front derailer depends on a spring to knock the chain off to the lower gears under torque. Shimano’s Rapidrise suffered from the same problem. The spring just isn’t strong enough to knock the chain off under high torque situations and, thus, the derailer just clatters against that chain until torque decreases enough that the spring can knock off the chain. If front derailers worked the same way as rear deraiers…i.e. the cable drags the chain off the larger gears to the smaller ones…the shifts on the front would be as lightning fast and efficient as the rear. Suntour made a few of the high normal front derailers (as did Shimano) that worked really well back in the days before pins and ramps on the chainrings...
i do not think that's the entirety of the issue. a modern electronic front derailleur has no spring, and you're not fighting against anything. the motor can move either way, just like the RD or a desmodromic derailleur. ultegra or dura ace di2 front shifts definitively but still way slower than the rear. like, not even a comparison.
__________________
mschwett is offline