View Single Post
Old 07-29-23, 02:54 PM
  #5  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,957

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4848 Post(s)
Liked 3,980 Times in 2,584 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
The sprocket is almost always round. However, it's likely not perfectly centered.

Try slightly loosening the mounting bolts, turn the crank to find the place where the chain is tightest. Now use a hammer to GENTLY tap the chainring at 3 o' clock to slacken the chain. Test and repeat until you get it as good as you can, then tighten the bolts.

Note that you will never get it perfect, so adjust chain for minimum, but not zero, slack at the tightest position.
Sheldon Brown has this routine nicely written up on his website. I believe it is in the fix gear section.

My observations about this have led me to the fact that all cranksets are not equals when it comes to roundness. That the better makes and models do better and also that cranksets for single and fix gears tend to be better than the same level of "road" or derailleur bike intended cranksets. That eccentricity doesn't matter on the road. There was even a time when some believed that eccentricity improved shifting so why spend money in careful tool setup and QC?

The cranksets intended for fix gear, and especially cranksets intended for the velodrome are much better with the best being near perfect. My Sugino 75 crankset at 20k road miles is so close I rarely feel a need to improve my first guess at chain slack after spinning the cranks and it is mounted on a medium priced (but velodrome worthy) square taper BB.
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney: