Originally Posted by
njkayaker
Your statement of "cause and effect" is seriously one sided.
The lack of traffic calming leads to "dangerous and risky driving" (sometimes) too. If traffic calming reduces "dangerous and risky driving", why are you only pointing that as a risk of traffic calming?
That would be a secondary effect of traffic calming. And traffic calming might be worth doing even if it failed to get more people to ride.
That’s all totally irrelevant to my point and irrelevant to stated goals of the city planners so I won’t comment on that stuff.