Originally Posted by
chaadster
...and only stated that driver frustration was an outcome, not that it was the only outcome, nor did state it was an outcome contrary to the intent of the measures....
It was the only direct outcome you mentioned. It's one sided. You don't seem to have any awareness of other possible outcomes.
It could be a minor issue or one that is outweighed by overall increases in "safety".
Originally Posted by
chaadster
But, I will say that I’m not at all sure that reducing driver frustration is one of the things which traffic calming measures are intended to reduce.
I never claimed traffic calming was intended to reduce "driver frustration".
Originally Posted by
chaadster
Anyway, I don’t think your line of discussion is either helpful or clarifying to my earlier comments since it keeps moving further afield from my point, so I’m just gonna leave it where it is.
Your point appears to be that traffic calming is bad (because it increases "driver frustration" which leads to "
"dangerous and risky driving").