Old 09-18-23, 12:37 AM
  #34  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,555

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3235 Post(s)
Liked 1,792 Times in 1,082 Posts
I’ve been on Zwift since the beta (testing) days, so about 10 years, but I’ve never gotten deeply engaged with it. I guess because I’d been doing coached, power-based stationary bike workouts for some years before Zwift and was quite comfy passing the time watching the numbers on the head unit and focusing on the workout segments, I was more interested in the Zwift tech than I was in need of something to make stationary work tolerable.

Zwift, then, was an adjunct to the coached, studio rides which I do 3x per week year-round, and so I never hand the need, interest, or bandwidth to get into the game part of Zwift. That is to say, I ride in Zwift with my own, external goals and don’t chase any of the in-game elements like goals, drops, PowerUps, RideOns, or that kind of stuff.

I certainly like Zwift better than watching rando vids while sweating away in the basement, and I like the terrain-variable resistance, preset ERG workouts, and ability to customize interval workouts. The social aspect is great, too; group rides, the keep-together utility…that kind of thing is great.

Ultimately, even though I really only use Zwift during the winter for a couple of rides a week and scarcely do anything more with it, it has become a critical piece of my cycling life, as a way to keep up socially with ridemates to maintain motivation and fitness.
chaadster is offline