View Single Post
Old 10-30-23 | 06:58 PM
  #57  
Kontact's Avatar
Kontact
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,791
Likes: 4,890
Originally Posted by cyccommute
You could have bolded it, underlined it, and put in italics. You are still wrong.
.
The reason I detest dealing with you (aside from the graphs, flow charts, pseudo science, paragraphs of yada yada and insults) is that you can't be bothered to read.

I wrote that machine built wheels, gone over by the bike mechanic to address tension and seating, will be a good wheel. You ignored the "gone over" part, then kept ignoring that is what I was talking about despite pointing it out to you twice. A total knucklehead move.


The problem with you is that the shear volume of intellectual-adjacent stuff you write will suggest to people that your ridiculous points about tension, rim design, etc, might have some validity. And those unfortunates might act on that wise sounding advice, instead of using time tested advice from people with much more quality experience than you. Many of us learned wheel building from experts. You learned by trial and error, and you didn't learn what we have.


Of course you have a lot of experience with broken spokes. You aren't building wheels correctly, and you are too 'smart' to accept anyone else's suggestions as to why. Instead you think any wheel without oversized elbows is garbage. Redic.
Kontact is offline  
Reply