View Single Post
Old 11-06-23, 04:20 AM
  #52  
88ss
Junior Member
 
88ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 175
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times in 55 Posts
Originally Posted by rsbob
Regarding the first bolded statement: So what? Doesn’t harm you in any way and if they have the money and inclination, so be it. Should people who can afford expensive cars instead be driving econoboxes because it is more moral to you? Or people who live in nice houses downsize to tiny houses because it suits you better? Interesting how you appoint yourself the judge of what is right and wrong.
The second statement is a totally bizarre. People typically use bike computers to record their stats - which again is a matter of personal choice. If they want to compare their stats, why not? Doesn’t harm you or anyone else. Pretty judgmental on stuff that doesn’t nicely fit into your preconceived world.
Ever heard of the expression, “live and let live”? It will save you a lot of consternation.
A basic tenet of human morality is to hold yourself to the same standards you hold others to, so by your standard you should " live and let live" and not criticize others, so make sure and come back when you learn to do that. But apparently it is okay for you to speak out on things you do not like about others, but not okay for them to do the same ??? LOOOOOOOOOL
88ss is offline