Old 11-29-23, 03:07 PM
  #13  
RiddleOfSteel
Master Parts Rearranger
 
RiddleOfSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,405

Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present

Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1557 Post(s)
Liked 2,029 Times in 989 Posts
As others have said, triple is your friend. I use it with 9- and 10-speed cassettes, even ('80s Trek tourers for me). It lets the rear gear set be tighter for all the benefits that tighter ratios bring, while easily providing a 1:1 ratio or sub-1:1 ratio. You get the additional aesthetic benefits of a triple on a tourer as it looks the part. I also like that the 26-28t small ring handles the slow/hard stuff, which allows the big ring to be 52-53t to handle all the downhill speed fun. I enjoy my dessert after eating vegetables. Plus, on 65cm+ frames like I ride, a 53t big ring gives a proportional look, which I appreciate.

You can geek out on the gear ratio calculators, and I have before, but a 52/39/28 up front and 13-28 6- or 7-speed freewheel out back (or very similar) should set you up for a lot of success. 8-speed indexing chain from SRAM or someone will work well.
RiddleOfSteel is offline  
Likes For RiddleOfSteel: