Originally Posted by mstateglfr

I dont know what I am supposed to take away from that article. Like really, what was Snob's point? As usual, its some good points mixed in with unrealistic expectations that are formed in Snob's mind and applied to others(companies and people).
Seems like an article that expects perfection(Snob's definition of course) and rejects anything less.

Really though, what am I supposed to take away from that? Why isnt is acceptable for a company have the import rights for some car brands and also own some bike brands? Or is the takeaway that if I dislike an oil company sponsoring things, I have to also not use anything from Pon's brands because they have the rights to import some vehicle brands to NL?
...I think the 2nd interpretation is what the take away is supposed to be. If that is the correct takeaway, all I can say is 'meh'. It isnt applicable to anyone that isnt also outraged over an oil company sponsoring something. So given that, the article was far from 'worth it'.