View Single Post
Old 12-26-23, 01:24 PM
  #12  
Kontact
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,261
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4530 Post(s)
Liked 1,673 Times in 1,096 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
I see no significant advantages to compact frames. The way I look at it, it's just styling. I have built one frame with a sloped top tube. I use effective seat tube and top tube length. To me, it seems like going with stack and reach is lacking a number, the seat tube angle.
What is the important function of seat tube angle? (Aside from making small bikes look like they have shorter top tubes.)

I like the companies that use 73 for the entire size range
Kontact is offline