View Single Post
Old 01-16-24, 12:34 PM
  #66  
veganbikes
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,707

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4431 Post(s)
Liked 4,074 Times in 2,717 Posts
Originally Posted by cat0020
You mean I haven't said what you want to hear.. and you're not going to; stop your baiting and get lost stalker.
No you cannot admit either way if you are opposed or not opposed to UL regulation. Nobody is stalking you or at least not here this is a public forum and a debate we are involved in. There is no stalking or baiting you are trying to bait everyone with your talk about things unrelated to battery and charger regulation. If you really are for UL regulation you would have said that and if you are against them you would likely go on the war path you have. It's ok to have a differing opinion but to claim it is not your opinion when you have pretty much made it clear it is, is just silly.

Again if you were for UL regulations you would have said that it is a popular opinion amongst a lot of people other than maybe those creating non-UL listed batteries and chargers. Nobody else seems to be opposed to safety on the front of batteries and chargers and if you are for safety you wouldn't need to hide it especially not here. If you were opposed you would probably want to deflect and make the issue less of an issue and do as you have done. If you want to dispel what I have said you would give your opinion and we would know for sure but barring that we go by your attitude and what you have written here and you have made it clear.

Nobody else is hiding and dodging just you. Kind of silly.
veganbikes is offline