View Single Post
Old 02-11-24 | 07:01 PM
  #53  
Duragrouch
Highly Enriched Driftium
5 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 6,397
Likes: 2,046
Originally Posted by Duragrouch
(above) Zero-cross, does not necessarily mean zero-angle. Many bikes with very large diameter hub motors use 0X by necessity, but the spokes are not radial, but are angled. It is not the cross per se that allows transmission of torque from the hub to the wheel, but the spoke angle other than pure radial.
Originally Posted by Trakhak
So they're pulling spokes on one side and trailing spokes on the other? Interesting. I was only aware of that spiral spoking being used for show-off wheel builds.

Still, there are zero-cross, zero-angle rear wheels out there, presumably used in applications where the strength of the build might have been inadequate for bikes with motors and/or disc brakes.
No, I didn't mean spiral on one side, and opposite spiral on the other side. I meant trailing and leading spokes on both sides, just not crossing. I see this most frequently with very large hubs (like a hub motor), most especially with smaller wheels (like 20"/406, and even 16"), where crossing the spokes would be extremely difficult and bad, *with low spoke numbers*, the spokes would meet the rim at a bad angle (assuming rims not dimpled, aimed and drilled). I *think* that 1X patterns are possible with higher spoke numbers, as the angles aren't as bad. But again, the crossing is not essential, just some trailing and leading angle to the spokes, and I've sometimes seen this, same side, 0X. It doesn't take that much angle to transmit torque, especially with a very large diameter hub, there's more leverage at the flange holes.
Duragrouch is offline  
Reply