Old 02-15-24, 04:54 AM
  #82308  
Aardwolf
Wheelman
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Putney, London UK
Posts: 857

Bikes: 1982 Holdsworth Avanti (531), 1961 Holdsworth Cyclone

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 299 Post(s)
Liked 685 Times in 345 Posts
Originally Posted by highlander8
Could the curly stays come around sometime in the modern period? How iconic were these British steeds, or were they just going for a gimmick?
Apparently the curly stays were to provide some butt suspension.
From https://www.hetchins.org/history.htm
Jack recalled a curly frame that he had seen on a stand at the Lightweight Cycle Exhibition at the Floral Hall. It had been made by Maurice Selbach who had said it was just a fancy idea. Not to Jack it wasn't! If the front forks curve to absorb road shocks, he thought, then why shouldn't I try to do the same thing with the rear stays?
He built his first frame with a gentle curve in the seat stays and the 'S' bend in the chain stays. The idea worked, the bends did damp the road shocks, but there was an unexpected benefit. The 'S' removed a great deal of the flexing of the bottom bracket zone.
The frame was given to one of the hard men of cycling to try, Harry Rothwell. In order to toughen himself and to test the frame thoroughly, Harry carried two house bricks in his saddle bag.
...
The development work was now completed and in 1932 [sic -- should be 1934] the Rear Vibrant Triangle (patent No 33317) and the Hetchins Vibrant Triangle (Patent No 443454) were taken out. The curly Hetchins was born. [There were not two patents, as O'Neill here suggests, but only one. --Editor]
And they are still being made: https://www.hetchins.org/903.htm

I'm not a fan of the curly stay look myself, but they were always optional I think.
Aardwolf is online now