Old 02-15-24, 03:38 PM
  #30  
veganbikes
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,917

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4495 Post(s)
Liked 4,174 Times in 2,795 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
As far as I know ... Hy/Rd are TRP. I have them on an MTB and absolutely great.

I have never heard a good thing about the Conduct brakes. Or did you mean All Giant bikes, in general, had more failures.

Not arguing what you say, just seeking clarification. If it was all Giants, what was going so wrong?

(Never owned a Giant, just did research because they were in the running for an N+1 ... nearly bought @PeteHski 's Defy ...... Also looked at a Fastroad and (I think) an Allroad, which was sort of a gravel bike back then. Seemed like good stuff, but went with a Fuji instead.
Yes the Hy/Rd are TRP but I think TRP also made the Giant brakes.

All Giant bikes especially their lower end bikes had more problems then similarly spec'd bikes from other manufacturers. Plus their proprietary stuff is ridiculous, seat posts but racks were proprietary mounting back in the day and their rack didn't look great.
veganbikes is online now