View Single Post
Old 02-16-24, 01:22 PM
  #346  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,808
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4598 Post(s)
Liked 5,142 Times in 3,177 Posts
Originally Posted by HTupolev
Due to the quadratic term, that's not how the math shakes out. 20->40 is not the same as 0->20. For the static portion, it's not...
.5*85*(5.55556^2)
...but rather...
.5*85*(11.1111^2 - 5.55556^2)
...which is 3935J.
Similarly, the rotating KE difference is about 278J, or 231J for the 2.5kg example.
Good catch, I had forgotten that my spreadsheet was starting with u=0
So those figures are actually for 0-20 kph

20-40 kph in 3 seconds requires around 1400W with a 15W saving for 0.5kg rim mass. Time saving is the same at 0.03 sec.

Either way it's not a lot for a seriously major acceleration and very large rim mass saving.

Last edited by PeteHski; 02-16-24 at 03:00 PM.
PeteHski is offline