View Single Post
Old 03-13-24 | 09:17 AM
  #37  
mikestr
Junior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 118
Likes: 127
From: Wine Country

Bikes: 1973 Mercier 300, 1974 Peugeot PX10L, 1977 Lejeune Champion du Monde, 1980 Peugeot PY 10 Super Competition, 1984 Motobecane SP, 1987 Peugeot PX10 "Tout Mavic," 1983 Basso Gap

Perhaps redshft1's (OP's) complaint has a more general cause that got lost (partly thanks to me) in the discussion of this particular model. If a 54x54 frame doesn't work for him even with. 6 cm stem, it's likely that one or more of the following are true or partially true:

He is trying to ride too large a frame;
He has an unusually short torso and reach;
He's attempting to achieve a more upright riding position than the typical racing frame is designed for.

As for the last cause, I myself struggle a bit with the conflicting requirements of riding efficiently and fast with needing to watch for traffic, or even enjoying the scenery without straining. But raising the stem (and/or choosing a shorter one) to sit more upright also removes me from the "sweet spot," the somewhat narrow range of positions for which a frame like the present one was designed, and I lose most of the sense of it. It would be a bit like replacing the suspension on a sports car to make it ride like a limousine. Sometimes it's better to choose a different type of vehicle?
mikestr is offline  
Reply