View Single Post
Old 03-18-24, 09:43 PM
  #9  
Jon_g2 
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 138

Bikes: Cannondale caad10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Liked 39 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
I am one who sees BBs as simply a tool for the job. Yes, better tools often last longer and may require less maintenance. Provide marginally better friction loss or maybe a shade stiffer. But usually, I am looking at the details of what it does. Now I have knees that love my feet being close together (low Q-factor). So much so that they announced to me they were going into retirement early if I ignored that request. (Ie, I'd have to get knee replacements to continue riding.)

So, for me, there is strong incentive to use BBs that are both as narrow as possible and fit cranksets with arms as straight as possible. So, I first find that crankset, then obtain the BB that fits it and is narrow. If I cannot find that, I will buy a Phil Wood BB, either stock or custom, that fills the bill. Expensive, yes, but my knees love the setup and I get to keep riding those cheap OEMs (knees). If my knees weren't so fussy, the $30 Shimanos would do the job just as well.
That is very useful information. I have considered slightly shorter cranks because I am going through physical therapy and I have read and watched many videos of the benefits of shorter cranks for people with my current issues. But that's a different topic.
Jon_g2 is offline