Old 04-17-24 | 06:38 AM
  #9  
Kontact's Avatar
Kontact
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,760
Likes: 4,873
Originally Posted by chaadster
Yeah, I understood dropped seatstays to be an aero thing.

In your second paragraph, I don’t know if you meant to change to chainstays, but you’re absolutely on point that it’s the chainstays which provide bump compliance. Seatstays are largely a vestige of a bygone era, and not necessary elements with modern materials. Back in the ‘80s, Trimble was making seatstay-less frames, and Trek’s Y-Foil in the ‘90s was very successful seatstsy-less design. Cervelo’s P5X from around ‘16 is a more recent example.

Those are carbon fiber, but looking at English Cycles steel designs with their literally pencil-thin seatstays, on frames meant for crit racing, not comfort— and you have to wonder if the seatstays don’t inhibit bump compliance rather than provide it.
Yes, I meant seat stays. And if seat stays are UCI necessity, making them long and narrow is going to allow them to flex better than any other configuration except for something pre-bowed.

But seat stays also prevent the wheel from twisting around the axis of the chainstays.
Kontact is offline  
Reply