I am all set to order the Onix with the Campy mix, FSA compact crank, and Rolf Apex wheels, when I noticed that for a few hundred more, I can get the Orca with Ultegra 10 instead of the Onix with Campy mix (and the same tires). I have never used Campy but I think I would prefer the shifters the way they are laid out on the bike and from speaking with others (although I don't "hate" the Shimano shifting system at all). I am a recreational rider and am 5 foot 10 and 173 pounds. I currently have a LeMond Buenos Aires which I am selling. Both the Onix and Orca are REALLY stretching my budget. When I saw that the Orca would be in the same price range with the Ultegra components, I started thinking - shouldn't I get the top of the line frame even if it means using Shimano? I mean, Ultegra should certainly be good enough for a non-racer like me, right (heck, either bike is way good enough for me). I also really like the like the look of the Orca more. I want to be able to ride this bike for many, many years, and don't want to have buyer's remorse thinking - "oh, I should have gone for the Orca."

From what I have read, both rides are comfortable, especially compared to the Opal.

What would you do?

Thanks,

Peter