Originally Posted by
PeteHski
I presume you meant 530 in your first sentence. I agree that the 520 was a bit of a dog and the 530 was a huge improvement. I haven’t tried the 40 series Garmins yet, but I get the impression they are more of an incremental upgrade. Or are they much better?
Yes, 530. The 840 and 540 might be incremental upgrades, but they seem fine (they aren’t dogs) regardless.
The 1030+ was a fairly significant upgrade to the 1030 (even if it might have been incremental).
(I don’t know much about the 1040.)