View Single Post
Old 06-19-24 | 12:52 AM
  #24  
merziac's Avatar
merziac
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 16,198
Likes: 9,582
From: PDX

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Originally Posted by bulgie
I was hoping for more than an emoji from you. Cat got your tongue?

Unlike merziac I'm not a Merz expert, but it's my uderstanding that serials starting with JM were only the bikes he built for himself. Most had other letters, the initials of the customer it was built for.

Bike in question is not a Merz, the reason I'm confident of that is the seatstays are attached too low on the lug. While that could be because the builder couldn't source seatstays that were long enough for this Gigantor, Jim was (and is) too much of a perfectionist to allow that. He'd have come up with some other solution. I dunno, splicing in another section of tube to make the stays longer maybe.

Just guessing really, but a Merz is more perfect than this frame in some other places too. I mean it's finely built, just not Merz-level.
Agreed.

we had a bunch of off forum back and forth on this, you are correct about the S/N's and I would contend that you are far more of an expert than I having done the same work as Jim and full well know what it takes to get here.

I considered many of the same points you bring up, the SS attachment, the poor work on the fork crown and unworked lugs all leave no doubt, not a Merz.

Last edited by merziac; 06-19-24 at 12:55 AM.
merziac is offline  
Reply